[Return] [Catalog]

1 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
Kemono VS Furry
»
2 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
realistic furry > kemono > unrealistic western furry
»
3 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>realistic furry
Might as well fuck an animal.
»
4 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>3
>Might as well fuck an animal.

Any type of fur is only for fapping, since you can't fuck fictional creatures.
»
5 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
feral furry is trash. kemono is where its at
»
6 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>5
I'm not much into feral either, myself. Animal genitalia on kemono and furry are fine though.
»
7 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
I like this one
https://exhentai.org/g/1004062/1df2424787/
»
8 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>7
>supporting sekritklubs like sadpanda

disgusting
Information wants to be free: all information should be public.
»
9 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>8
I don't support exhentai but the jew cunt removed it from g.e-hentai and I didn't want to search for it somewhere else when I already had the link.
»
10 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>9
I see. Could you post it on something like dropbox or megaupload?
»
11 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>10
It's too much effort and I don't like it THAT much. Also, everyone and their dogs know about exhentai. Just log in and do it yourself.
»
12 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>11
But to make an account would be to support something unethical to support: something similar to freemasonry and fraternities: sadpanda.
»
13 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>7
Please share this.
»
14 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>8
>>9
>>12
Fuck off. Nothing's wrong with Sadpanda. It's not even a secret club, it's super easy to get in.
»
15 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
how do i get past the sad panda
»
16 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>14
>nothing's wrong with freemasonry, it's super easy to get in
»
17 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>16
He didn't say that. And there is nothing wrong with freemasonry.
»
18 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>17
>there is nothing wrong with freemasonry

Wow, tomorrow, you might even say there's nothing wrong with religion or fascism.
»
19 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>18
There is nothing wrong with religion. Fascists hate Freemasons.
»
20 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>19
>There is nothing wrong with religion.

Why do you hate freedom?
»
21 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>20
Religion can be practiced in a free manner.
»
22 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>21
No, because religion is inherently about lying, and taking away freedom.
»
23 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>22
I don't think you know what lying means.
»
24 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>23
Being dishonest.
»
25 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>22
Not inherently. Granted, this is a common expression of religion, but each religion in and of itself is simply a collection of magical technology and philosophy. Consequently, it is not necessary to perceive any religion's typical constructed form as inherent to the magic and philosophy contained therein. Additionally, religions which aim to empower the practitioner should not be erased.
»
26 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>religions which aim to empower the practitioner should not be erased
No such religions exist.
»
27 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00 [ImgOps] [iqdb]
File: image.png (PNG, 944.33 KB, 900x1270)
>>24
Lying is knowingly making false statements with the intent to deceive. If you believe something to be true, you are not lying if you proclaim it as truth, even if it is false.

How did we get from kemono vs. furry to this? Commie-atheist-san couldn't figure out how to get past the panda?
»
28 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>27
>getting past the panda to freemasonry

Information wants to be free.
»
29 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>26
>I don't have a clue what I'm talking about

Satanism, Thelema...
»
30 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>29
Gnosticism...
»
31 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
Why do these two guys above me use so many dots?
»
32 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>31
I don't know............. maybe..... redditors...............
»
33 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>31
It was to indicate that the list was incomplete but I could not think of any more at the moment. Notice that I used the correct number of dots to form an ellipse in a context where that punctuation mark is correct, as opposed to the long streams of dots which needlessly interrupt the posts of the pretentious and/or mentally ill.
»
34 Anonymous 1969-12-31T17:00:00
>>32
I don't use reddit..............

[Return] [Catalog]
Delete Post:
OptionsPassword
Name
Comment
File