>>421
>who is in the wrong here?
the op

DICKS!

What is this even trying to say?

>>4
It's a parody of a comic artist that constantly tries to use his comics to defend racism.

>>2

>>5
he doesn't defend racism, he defends free speech. He's also a nationalist. There's nothing wrong with being a nationalist.

>>7
He has, and even if he didn't he's a really bad cartoonist who panders to people who already agree with him rather than trying to convince the public why he's right. It's the right wing equivalent of assigned male; identity placation with no actual substance

I like those comics, I find them humorous.

Jerkcity number one

>>8
Nothing wrong with pandering. Also, I think it's pretty difficult to have opinionated works on the internet without being accused of it.

>>11
The point of a political cartoon is to convince people that your stance is the correct one. If outsiders literally cannot understand your comics you're an objectively bad cartoonist.

>>12
>The point of a political cartoon is to convince people that your stance is the correct one
Name 1 (one) political comic successful in doing this.

>>13
Bloom county.

But I get it. Most political cartoons are pretty bad at their jobs. But the thing is, Stonetoss is especially bad at it. Something like the comic >>5 posted would literally be incomprehensible to anyone who isn't already familiar with imageboards.

>>9
Some of them are good. Some of them are obnoxious.
But the anger he inspires in certain people will always make me like them.