Corpses can't give consent.

>>2
exactly, it's impossible to rape them because they can't not want it
essentially it's an object at that point

we get it bro, your mom died. get over it.

you won't get away with raping my corpses for free

You can't win, not against my corpse.

I'm dead, which means I've already won.

>>2
There's no actual problem with that, since corpses aren't living beings. An onahole can't give consent either, but that's not a problem for anyone. It's not like "raping" a dead body is going to cause it any lasting mental trauma or anything.
The real problem with necrophilia is partially risk of diseases, but also largely just a general concept of respect for the dead. A dead body holds very high sentimental value for the friends and family of the deceased, so putting your dick into it would be highly disrespectful. It would be like going into your friend's house and then just cumming all over a beloved keepsake or family heirloom. That wouldn't be okay.

I wonder if any culture has ever had necrophilia as part of a funeral ritual. Like, the deceased's lover making love to them one last time before the body is buried or cremated. The concept seems really romantic to me.

>>1
There is everything wrong with Necrophilia.

>>8
Necrophilia is wrong because it's unsanitary. Fucking a rotting corpse is a great way to make your dick fall off.

>>10
It takes several days for the body to start decomposing, so if one gets on with it in first 24 hours then damage to genitalia shouldn't be a concern.

>>10
I did mention risk of diseases in my post, but as >>11 said, fucking a corpse doesn't always mean fucking a _rotting_ corpse.
If you were specifically addressing the last part of my post, eating a rotting corpse is also unsanitary, and yet cannibalism has been part of funeral rituals in the past. There are ways to be safe about it, chief among them being to not wait until the body starts rotting.