hi

So, what are you watching, lately? I'm watching Hajime No Ippo, right now. It's good.

uh, Space Ghost: Coast to Coast?

>>4 i don't understand this show. is there any point in watching it now if i've never seen it when it was on tv?

>>5
Why was our last post days ago?
Where is everyone?
pls respond

>>6
I am here.

>>7
Oh, thank God.

>6
I am here too! ( ﾟヮﾟ)

Another survivor

shit I completely forgot about this place

I made a thread!

>>5 I'm not too sure WHY I'm watching it myself, but they seem to get very consciously aware that their show is shit around episode 4, and that's the point at where things started to get bearable for me

I don't like posting much and making a real effort if there's no activity, because it feels embarrasing, like going up on stage and holding a presentation when there's three people in the audience and two of them leave halfway through. But if people don't post then there's no activity.

>>14
I feel the same. We need a topic of discussion. I already tried with my Alt-His thread.

WHERE ARE YOU GUYS?

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

Still spending most my imageboard time on the queue ayy, although it's becoming slow and that's a bit of a problem with lingering (though ignored) troll threads.
Why does this happen to every internet community I like, 4taba?

>>18
Which imageboard are you talking about?

>>19
/qa/ probably

4chan's? That can't be right

yeah its 4chans /qa/

>>18
I think there are several people here from /qa/ by now, myself included. Sometimes I wonder if the effort expended over there to try to improve the place isn't better spent on a place like here where the moderation isn't hostile to the users and the administration is willing to try new things. Can that happen without polluting this place with /qa/'s problems? Spammers could presumably be banned, and if this site is to survive and grow long term, it ought to be hardened against spammers anyway. But the paranoia about discords ever since the /mlpol/ conflict and the people trying to provoke stupid Internet wars are more insidious, and it poses the question whether those social problems can be solved any better here than there. The answer depends on to what extent that paranoia is a result of the spamming.

I'm not proposing launching an advertisement campaign over there, unless the older users here think the place is desperate enough for traffic that the risk of attracting undesirables is acceptable. More a reallocation of effort among people already here, if it's not seen as unwelcome.

>>23
I don't know if it's even ready to handle that much traffic. I don't think there's ever really been more than a few people posting/browsing this place at once, and the code was made from scratch so it's not tried and tested either.

You weren't followed, right? Cool, cool, hop in. You can roll with us.

that was a very good post

the problem lies with the internet being so homogeneous nowadays. the average user can go to 4chan and discuss any topic they want. it wont be a very good discussion, but that's enough for some people. I guess the majority see it as "if I can discuss anything here, then what's the point of looking elsewhere". this makes it hard to bring new people in, and without a wide array of opinions and ideas there isn't an awful lot to talk about. from my experience the people who are more likely to find places like this care a lot more about the quality of posts, and thus are less likely to make a comment if someone has already said what they would, or post at all if they don't feel like they're contributing to the thread. without lots of different opinions, and people being more hesitant to repeat ones already posted, it can make a board seem a lot more dead than it is, and I don't think I need to explain why that's a bad thing.
>>23
/qa/ is a double-edged sword. while it does have some of the more competent and friendly posters, it also has a very large subgroup of undesirables. while I think it could be a good thing to invite some people from there to here I don't think it would be worth the risk of also bringing in the others.

I'm fairly sure that, even as the number of people using the web has gone up massively, the number of people using anything but the very biggest sites has gone down.

>>28
Yes. Consolidation strikes again. I also find myself visiting the same few sites over and over again. It's no coincidence that these are all sites with a high frequency of updates.

>>29
That image is much bigger than it needs to be.

>>30
It's not too big, you're just too small.

I just posted a link in a birthday thread on /a/.
I hope Taba-tan doesn't mind if I post a link or two, here or there. I'll stop if he wants me to.

>>32
Ur a faget.

no u