» | 24 guest@cc 2020-05-06T11:07:59>The final binary is going to be the same and that's what really matters. Nevertheless, the programme actually matters. A programme is a description of a process. It is the primary source about the process it describes. Presently, many pragmïnformaticals' edifactaries are poor. It is reasonable that vainary (i.e. it's self) or tertiary (e.g. wikis) sources are poor; it's vainary source is only to do itself, it's tertiary sources are too distant. (It's antiprimary source is (only partly) accessible to only it's authors.) Wellest, often, are (sadly, often manuscribed, thus more letting organic errata) secondary sources. It's unreasonable, yet popular, that primary sources are poor. Alarming? Don't manuscribe, let exact processes esscribe, secondaries. Literate programming, he says, is to {\sl for a person} write it, markt suffact for distal derivion of the therein described, ready for a person, understanding it, to use it.
>The real benefit would be not having to press shift all the time That can only be a problem if you're tired. If you are {\sl tired}, you shouldn't be at the terminal. Rest. Only while refreshed, awake, et cetera can one reliably produce reliable programmes. |
|